A tense encounter between a man and Luzerne County deputies unfolded this week after officers responded to a report of a visibly intoxicated individual asking for a ride home. Body-worn camera audio and eyewitness accounts captured the exchange as the situation quickly escalated from a routine check to a custodial detention.
When deputies approached the man, one officer asked directly, “Are you under the influence of something?” The man initially denied drug use, but another officer and bystanders noted the smell of alcohol. “He’s been drinking,” an officer said. “I can smell it.” When asked how much he had consumed, the man replied, “Three beers,” prompting an exasperated comment from officers about the recurring “three beers” explanation.
Officers offered to get him a ride home and asked whether he had anyone who could pick him up. The man said no. The encounter took a confrontational turn when deputies informed him he would be taken to the county jail. “All right, we’ll take you out to the jail,” an officer told him. The man bristled at the idea, claiming he paid taxes and even asserting he “made $150,000 last year,” while accusing officers of detaining him for their own amusement or publicity.
“Go ahead, touch me. Do something wrong,” he challenged. “I dare you.” The officers remained firm but procedural, warning that while no formal charge had yet been lodged, he was being detained and could face further action. “You’re going to jail. For what?” the man demanded. An officer replied that being drunk in public could lead to a breathalyzer and further proceedings.
At one point, another officer pointed out signage indicating the presence of the sheriff’s office and clarified that the man’s request for a ride did not make the deputies a taxi service. The man continued to taunt the officers, sparring about breath odor and making disparaging remarks about their appearance and training. Despite the heated back-and-forth, deputies moved to place the man in a patrol vehicle. “Get up on the car. Let’s get him in the car,” an officer instructed.
The footage—short but pointed—highlights how quickly encounters involving suspected intoxication can become confrontational. Law enforcement officials frequently emphasize that officers must balance public safety with de-escalation, and intoxicated individuals may present unpredictable behavior that can require custodial intervention for their own safety.
Local prosecutors and courts ultimately decide whether to file charges such as disorderly conduct or public intoxication based on the facts and any tests administered, such as a breathalyzer. In this case, the audio indicates deputies intended to administer further screening and potentially take the individual to the Luzerne County jail.
The incident has drawn mixed reactions among viewers of the video: some criticized the man’s belligerent behavior and said officers acted appropriately to prevent potential harm, while others questioned whether arrest was necessary for what began as a simple request for a ride. As the footage circulates, it serves as a reminder of how quickly a small public disturbance can escalate when alcohol, pride, and law enforcement intersect.
About the Author
